There is a move in institutional life that hides in plain sight. It calls itself collegiality.
A reasonable issue is raised. A link is broken. A guide is outdated. The work is not the problem. It is ordinary.
What shifts is the structure.
A directive is issued without consultation. Authority is assumed rather than named. The tone stays polite. It may even gesture toward shared responsibility. But the relationship has already been decided.
This is not collaboration. It is instruction wearing the language of care.
Collegiality, here, functions as a cover. It smooths what would otherwise register as overreach. It makes direction look like cooperation. And because the task itself is reasonable, any objection can be recast as resistance, ego, or a failure to be a team player.
That is the trap.
The reasonableness of the work becomes cover for the unreasonableness of the channel.
There are ways to tell the difference. Not in tone alone. In structure, how the request moves, what it assumes, and where authority sits. Once you see it, it becomes difficult to unsee.
To name this is not to refuse the work. Broken links should be fixed. Shared resources require maintenance. The question is not whether the work gets done. The question is who gets to decide how that work is assigned, framed, and carried.
Collegiality is not a flattening device. It does not grant authority by tone. It does not convert colleagues into subordinates simply by speaking as if that relationship already exists.
At its best, collegiality is a practice of mutual recognition. It asks. It situates. It invites. It does not presume.
When that distinction collapses or is bypassed, the word thins. It remains in circulation, but its function shifts. What once named a relationship becomes a method of managing others without appearing to do so. And something is lost.
Not efficiency. Not output. What is lost is harder to name and slower to recover: the condition under which people can work together without one person quietly carrying what no one has acknowledged.
If collegiality is to mean anything, it must remain a relationship, not a technique for control.
Leave a Reply